Everything is important in analysis, the mere information that Lauren Faust and 
al. worked on this can change your own stance about the thing you're reviewing. 
And for me, it's not a reason to ignore this information: even if you try to 
escape it, the fact that you TRY means you're aware of it, you can't escape 
this piece of information. I know that you may seek an objective truth by 
putting the artwork above the rest, but as soon as you, as a human, opened your 
mouth, this ideal collapsed.
Imagine that for each piece of work, there's an intrinsic, idealistic, 
completely fair review. The problem is you can't reach it, since your own 
review will be forcibly influenced by everything you experienced before, it 
will be somehow "tainted". There's pretty much no use in trying to escape 
reality, because as soon as you decided to do that, your perception of the 
world will be tainted in a similar fashion.

>I'm not seeking an objective truth what I wish to do is open the world for 
more subjectivity.

Strictly speaking, I think the whole objectivity/subjectivity duality is an 
illusion, I only use the word because everyone can relate to what I mean by 
"truth" in this context, the truth value of logical propositions. Actually, 
what you may deem subjective could be the only thing you could rely on to 
assert the existence of things, hence making your perception of things the 
builder of objectivity, which implies that subjectivity and objectivity are 
pretty much the same impenetrable notion.